15 min read
Published on: Mar 6, 2024
Last updated on: Oct 28, 2024
Share this article
Starting on the journey of publishing your study in a prestigious journal? The results section is your platform to showcase the heart of your research – the key findings.
It's not just about presenting data; it's about the answers to your research questions, and confirming or challenging your initial hypotheses.
In our guide, we'll break down the steps to write this section so you can share your research findings effectively. Stick around to learn how to make your results clear and valuable.
Let’s get started!
On This Page
The Results section of a scientific research paper encapsulates the primary study findings, objectively presented in a logical sequence. It avoids author interpretation, serving as a factual account of data.
Positioned after methods section, it precedes the discussion section. Its essence lies in breaking down data to illustrate significance in relation to research questions.
In essence, the Results section addresses the fundamental inquiry: "What did you find in your research?"
Note:
When constructing the results section, keep in mind that study outcomes don't prove anything. They can only validate or refute the research problem at the core of your study.
The results section in a research paper serves the important role of presenting the outcomes of your study. Let's highlight some primary goals of the results section in your research paper:
The Results section of a scientific paper exclusively incorporates the study's findings, comprising:
When organizing the findings section of a research paper, a systematic approach ensures clarity and coherence. Here is how to structure your results section:
Introduction to Results:
Structured Presentation of Findings:
Closing Paragraph:
|
Note:
In some research fields, especially qualitative studies like ethnographies, there might not be a separate results section. Instead, findings are merged within the Discussion section. Always check your target journal's guidelines for formatting.
Let's go through the steps to write a results section for your research paper in detail.
To start with your result section for a research paper, consider the following points:
Examine the instructions provided by the target journal or publisher for authors. Understand specific requirements outlined for the results or findings section.
Analyze research papers published by the journal, particularly those related to your study's topics, methods, or results. Extract insights from successful approaches showcased in these articles.
Be aware of length limitations and content restrictions specified by the journal. Recognize variations, such as whether the Results and Discussion sections are separate or combined.
Read the journal's "guide for authors" section to grasp its aims and scope. Understand the interests of the readership, gaining valuable insights for shaping your Results section.
The next step is to organize your research results for clarity and understanding of the upcoming steps. Here is what to consider:
Pinpoint outcomes directly linked to your research questions and objectives. Focus on experimental findings that contribute meaningfully to your study.
Employ subheadings to group and classify results thematically. Facilitate a clear organizational structure for both yourself and your readers.
Contemplate including appendices for intricate or specialist details. Ensure these appendices cater to readers with specific interests, avoiding unnecessary length or distraction in the main text.
Choose a coherent and logical order for presenting your results. Align the structure with the progression of your research questions, hypotheses, or the sequence outlined in the methods section.
Designing effective figures and tables is vital for visually representing your data. Follow these detailed steps to incorporate non-textual elements in your results section:
Assign numbers to tables and figures according to the sequence they appear in the main text. Ensure a logical and consistent reference system for readers to locate visual elements easily.
Craft figures that are relatively self-explanatory, aided by informative captions. Include all necessary definitions and contextual information within the figure to allow readers to grasp findings without extensive reliance on the accompanying text.
Utilize tables and figures as focal points to narrate a clear and informative story about your research. Avoid redundancy by ensuring visual elements complement and enhance the text without duplicating information.
Acknowledge that while figures clarify and enrich the text, they cannot entirely replace it. Strike a balance between textual and visual elements, using each to reinforce and complement the other.
After gathering and organizing all the necessary data, it's time to write the results section. Here is what to consider when writing a result section:
Aim to communicate complex information with utmost clarity and precision. Employ precise and compact language for maximum effectiveness in conveying your results.
In the opening paragraph, restate your research questions or aims. This refocusing helps direct the reader's attention to the specific objectives the results aim to demonstrate.
Conclude the results section by summarizing key findings. This summary serves as a bridge, creating a logical transition to the interpretation and discussion that will follow. It provides a quick overview, helping readers grasp the main outcomes.
Write in the past tense and active voice to relay the findings. Since the research has already been conducted, using the past tense adds clarity. Active voice makes the agent (performer of the action) clear, enhancing the overall coherence and logic of your explanations.
Ensure that any specialized terminology or abbreviations used in this section have been previously defined and clarified in the introduction. This practice prevents confusion and aids reader understanding, maintaining consistency throughout your paper.
The final step is to review and revise your draft 1 or 2 times for enhanced clarity, coherence, and overall refinement.
Double-check all data for accuracy and consistency. Ensure that the information presented aligns with your research findings and is error-free.
Read your draft aloud to identify language errors, including grammar, spelling, and mechanical issues. This method helps uncover awkward phrases and ensures a smoother flow of information.
Evaluate the order of your results to guarantee the best presentation. Ensure that your results are strategically arranged to highlight objectives and seamlessly guide readers toward interpretations, evaluations, and recommendations in the discussion section.
Revisit the paper's introduction and background while anticipating the discussion and conclusion sections. Confirm that the presentation of your results aligns with the overall narrative and remains consistent throughout the paper.
Consider seeking input from others. Invite peers, professors, or qualified experts to review your results section. External perspectives can offer valuable insights and suggestions for improvement, enhancing the overall quality of your paper.
Below is a comparison table highlighting the key differences between qualitative and quantitative data:
Aspect | Qualitative Data | Quantitative Data |
Nature of Data | Descriptive, non-numeric information | Numerical, measurable information |
Type of Measurement | Categorical or ordinal | Continuous or discrete |
Representation | Words, pictures, or symbols | Numbers and statistics |
Examples | Colors, feelings, opinions | Height, weight, temperature |
Analysis Approach | Subjective and interpretive | Objective and statistical |
Data Collection | Observations, interviews, focus groups | Surveys, experiments, measurements |
Precision | Less precise and subjective | More precise and objective |
Generalization | Limited generalization | Generalizable to a larger population |
Purpose | Exploratory and in-depth understanding | Statistical inference and prediction |
Examples in Research | Case studies, content analysis | Regression analysis, hypothesis testing |
Keeping this information in view let's take a look at the findings section of a qualitative research paper and quantitative research paper and check out the difference practically:
Here's a sample of a quantitative results section to explain each part:
[Participants] The study involved a total of 150 participants, randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=75) receiving the new drug or the control group (n=75) receiving a placebo. [Descriptive Statistics] The mean age of participants in the experimental group was 45.6 years (SD = 3.2), and in the control group, it was 44.8 years (SD = 3.5). There were 35% female participants in the experimental group and 40% in the control group. [Baseline Measures] Before the intervention, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) was comparable between the experimental group (M = 130.5 mmHg, SD = 5.2) and the control group (M = 131.2 mmHg, SD = 4.8). [Effect of the New Drug] After six weeks of treatment, the experimental group showed a statistically significant reduction in SBP (M = 120.3 mmHg, SD = 4.5) compared to the control group (M = 130.8 mmHg, SD = 5.0). The difference was significant (t(148) = 4.68, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.75). [Subgroup Analysis] Subgroup analysis revealed that the new drug was particularly effective in participants with baseline SBP greater than 140 mmHg (n = 50), showing a mean reduction of 12.5 mmHg (SD = 3.8). [Adverse Effects] No significant differences in reported adverse effects were observed between the experimental and control groups, ensuring the safety profile of the new drug |
Here's a sample results section of a qualitative research paper example with a focus on understanding the experiences of participants in a study on job satisfaction:
[Thematic Analysis] Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed several key themes related to job satisfaction. Four overarching themes emerged from the narratives of the 20 participants. [Theme 1: Supportive Work Environment] Participants consistently expressed the importance of a supportive work environment. Subthemes included positive relationships with colleagues, approachable supervisors, and a sense of camaraderie within the workplace. [Theme 2: Recognition and Appreciation] A prevalent theme among participants was the desire for recognition and appreciation for their contributions. Employees valued acknowledgment from supervisors and peers, and those who received such recognition reported higher levels of job satisfaction. [Theme 3: Work-Life Balance] Work-life balance emerged as a crucial theme affecting job satisfaction. Participants emphasized the need for flexibility in work schedules, opportunities for remote work, and policies that promote a healthy balance between professional and personal life. [Theme 4: Career Development Opportunities] Participants expressed a desire for opportunities for career growth and development. Those who perceived a clear path for advancement and had access to professional development opportunities reported higher levels of satisfaction with their jobs. [Richness of Participant Experiences] Beyond the identified themes, the richness of participant experiences was evident. Individual stories showcased the nuanced nature of job satisfaction, with some participants finding fulfillment in non-traditional aspects, such as workplace events and mentorship programs. |
Examples serve as effective tools for learning new concepts. We've assembled a collection of instances illustrating the results and findings in research within a PDF document. Check out:
Here's a table outlining what to include and what not to include while writing the Results Section of a research paper:
Dos | Don'ts |
Clearly present key findings. | Avoid introducing new information not in the results. |
Use concise and precise language. | Don't include personal opinions or speculations. |
Organize results logically. | Avoid including raw data without interpretation. |
Utilize visuals (tables, figures). | Don't exaggerate or overstate your findings. |
Refer to the guidelines of the journal. | Avoid including irrelevant details. |
Provide context for each result and do not omit the negative results. | Don't include information that belongs in the discussion. |
Use past tense and active voice. | Avoid using jargon or specialized terms without explanation. |
Summarize key findings at the end. | Don't include results that are not directly relevant to the research questions. |
Check consistency with other sections and present in unbiased manner. | Avoid being overly repetitive in presenting the results. |
Seek feedback from peers or mentors. | Don't manipulate data or present biased interpretations. |
In conclusion, writing an effective results section requires precision and clarity. By organizing data logically, using appropriate visuals, and maintaining a balance between detail and conciseness, you can enhance the impact of your research paper.
Remember, the results section is a vital component, laying the foundation for meaningful discussions and conclusions. If you find yourself struggling with your research paper results, don't hesitate to seek assistance.
CollegeEssay.org is a professional writing service ready to support you with your writing assignments. Our team consists of research paper-writing experts from various disciplines.
Connect with our research paper writing service for expert guidance and ensure the success of your academic endeavors.
The results section presents raw data and findings, describing what was observed. The discussion section interprets these results, explaining their meaning and significance. The conclusion section summarizes the key findings, discusses their broader implications, and suggests potential avenues for future research.
No, the results section is not the place for raw data. Instead, present summarized and interpreted data using tables, graphs, or descriptive statistics. Raw data can be included in appendices.
Yes, provide a balance of descriptive statistics (e.g., means, standard deviations) and inferential statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) to offer a comprehensive overview of your findings.
Acknowledge outliers and anomalous data if they exist. Discuss their potential impact on the overall findings and consider conducting sensitivity analyses if necessary.
WRITTEN BY
Betty P. (Literature, Natural Sciences)
Betty is a freelance writer and researcher. She has a Masters in literature and enjoys providing writing services to her clients. Betty is an avid reader and loves learning new things. She has provided writing services to clients from all academic levels and related academic fields.
Betty is a freelance writer and researcher. She has a Masters in literature and enjoys providing writing services to her clients. Betty is an avid reader and loves learning new things. She has provided writing services to clients from all academic levels and related academic fields.
Need Help With Your Essay?
Also get FREE title page, Turnitin report, unlimited revisions, and more!
Order Essay at 50% Off Offer Expiring Soon!on 3 Purchases
Valid from 27th Nov to 3rd Dec
6 Days
:5 Hrs
:9 Mins